Cal TAC Member Shares Experience At NAE Symposium
October 1, 2009
On September 8th, the National Academy of Engineering and the National Research Council held a
symposium to release a new report emphasizing the importance of introducing engineering into K-12
education. The report examines the status and nature of efforts to teach engineering in U.S.
schools. California Teacher Advisory Council (Cal TAC) member Pete Arvedson attended the
symposium to participate in the discussion with the committee.
"This was a great experience and a wonderful opportunity to share the Cal TAC message and
perspective with a broader audience from industry, education, and government," said Arvedson.
The committee found that engineering education opportunities in K-12 schools have expanded
considerably in the past 15 years. Since the early 1990s, the report estimates, about 6 million
children have been exposed to some formal engineering coursework. However, this number is still
small compared with the overall number of students in K-12 schools (approximately 56 million in
2008).
Arvedson notes that, while the emphasis on introducing an additional focus on math and science skills and graduating more
engineers is
positive, the study demonstrated a lack of familiarity with certain realities of the K-12 classroom.
"There was a lot of focus on the importance of introducing more problem-based learning," said Arvedson. "K-12
educators already know that problem-based learning is needed. Practical application, though, is often hindered by
district, state, and federal mandates that focus only on test scores. Problem-solving cannot occur without time to explore -
time not allowed by district-developed standards calendars created to help boost test scores."
Likewise, Arvedson noted that symposium participants did not seem to recognize the increasing
tendency of math and science teachers to work together, suggesting that engineering could serve to
integrate separated curriculum 'silos'.
"Small learning communities are already an important part of many middle and high schools," said
Arvedson. "A substantial paradigm shift does need to take place in K-12 engineering education, but
it is not necessarily the one indicated here."
The report's recommendations include funding research to determine how science inquiry and
mathematical reasoning can be connected to engineering design in curricula and professional
development, and the commencement of a national dialogue on preparing K-12 engineering teachers.
"This report is likely to have an impact on release of funds from government and private
agencies, as well as industry," said Arvedson. "This would be a good time to promote research on
those topics mentioned in the recommendations, as well as plan and implement the kind of
well-designed, effective teacher professional development that Cal TAC has been discussing for so
long."